Connect with us

Arts + Culture

8 of the Best Entries From the Wonder Woman Weapon Design Contest

Published

on

If there’s one weapon you’d want to grant Wonder Woman with, what would it be?

Two weeks before the premiere of the Wonder Woman movie, we asked our community to submit their weapon ideas for the Amazonian princess. Out of 184 active entries, we shortlisted eight submissions from which we selected the three winning designs.

8 of the Best Entries From the Wonder Woman Weapon Design Contest - Image 1

This “Dooms Edge” by Mayank94214 from India was the runaway winner. He also made a fanart illustrating how this axe looks a lot more awesome once it’s in the hand of Wonder Woman.

WW Dooms Edge.jpg

wonder woman freelancer design contest

This “Golden Phoenix Scepter” by BonaFideGPX is one of the two runners-up. The Filipino designer wrote in her description that Diana can summon the Phoenix using this scepter and will be protected by its blazing shield.

WW Golden Phoenix Scepter.jpg

And this is how it looks like on shield mode:

Phoenix Shield Mode.jpg

Another runner-up is this “Hephaestus’ Staff” created by dandrexrival07, also from the Philippines. This weapon yields the weapons of Zeus (Thunderbolt), Poseidon (Trident), and Hades (Hellfork).

WW Hephaestus Staff_Original.jpg

The designer also provided details about the staff itself and how it can help Wonder Woman in her battles.

WW Hephaestus Staff_Explanation.jpg

Here are the other cool designs we picked from the submissions:

This “Helios Scepter” may look quite fancy for someone as tough as Diana, but it’s still something we can imagine her using. Any weapon bearing the power of the gods would be useful particularly in her duel with Ares.

WW entry #25.jpg

Entry #25 by johannverdi (Venezuela)

How about another sword? It may be shorter than the one Diana already owns but because, according to the designer, this sword was forged by Hephaestus, we thought that this weapon was destined to kill Ares. If you can recall, Ares had an affair with his own sister, Aphrodite, Hephaestus’ wife.

WW entry #195.jpg

Entry #195 by Arthurhenri11 (Brazil)

This “Simitar of the Lost Souls” is among our favorite entries. It’s also done by BonaFideGPX (it’s part of the contest rules that a designer can only win once). We can already picture Wonder Woman with this pair.

WW entry #178.jpg

Entry #178 by BonaFideGPX (Philippines)

These last two designs both originated from Hades. The “Helm of Hades” below is a creation by DenioViana. Apart from the power of invisibility, we asked him how this helm will affect Diana’s personality. He said when Wonder Woman wears it, Hades will control her and influence her to get angry. Not sure if that’s a good thing though.

WW entry #79.jpg

Entry #79 by DenioViana (Brazil)

This “Helm of Light” also gives Wonder Woman the power of invisibility. Additionally, it affects her personality, and the more she uses this helm, the stronger the effect of darkness will be in her. But what sets this helm apart from the first one is the “Divine Stone”, which nullifies the scathing effect to her personality.

WW entry #191.jpg

Entry #191 by dandrexrival07 (Philippines)

We had such a great time running this contest. Every day, we were looking forward to more and more brilliant designs. What surprised us were the backstories and descriptions the designers wrote in the entries. It was fun reading through all of them! Look at the rest of the entries and see what we’re talking about.

If you missed this competition, check out ongoing illustration contests you can join in. And if you’re an employer looking to receive fantastic illustrations as the ones presented in this blog, post your own contest today.

Hello Every Body You need post On hufforbes than Contect me........Thanks.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Arts + Culture

How E! Tried, And Failed, To Bring The #MeToo Movement To The Red Carpet

Published

on

X

“Congratulations on your nomination. I loved [insert name of relevant movie/TV show/miniseries]. Oh, and you look beautiful! Tell me about your dress.”

That’s pretty much the way red carpet coverage goes, year in and year out, awards show after awards show.

Except this year.

Ahead of the Golden Globe Awards on Sunday, celebrities announced that they would be wearing all-black outfits to the festivities this year, a gesture to the recent Time’s Up initiative combatting workplace sexual harassment. Black gowns. Black pantsuits. Black tuxedos. The darkest shade was the color of the evening, chosen to symbolize celebrities’ fight against misconduct. The New York Times, responding to the news, predicted that the 2018 awards show would involve a very different kind of red carpet experience.

Indeed, E!, the network with a monopoly on red carpet coverage, attempted to acquiesce to the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements by refocusing its on-carpet interviews. Yes, the hi-res Glambot camera was still in play. But instead of the usual style-related queries, hosts Ryan Seacrest and Giuliana Rancic asked actress after actress questions about gender disparity in Hollywood and the recent sexual misconduct reckoning.

The effort was undeniable, but so was the network’s failure: Seacrest and Rancic put women on the spot, and left their male colleagues unchallenged.

Gone were the tiring questions and comments common to the carpet: Namely, “Who are you wearing?” Yet the obvious gender imbalance of pre-show fashion parades remained. Actress Michelle Williams spent her interview praising her guest for the evening, #MeToo movement instigator and Girls for Gender Equity senior director Tarana Burke. And Meryl Streep used her time to advocate for the work of National Domestic Workers Alliance director Ai-jen Poo.

But actors like Bob Odenkirk and Justin Timberlake managed to avoid serious questions like those hurled at their female counterparts. E! didn’t ask them what they thought of the Harvey Weinstein effect.

Of course, E! had the best of intentions.

“We’re not asking, ‘Who are you wearing?’ We’re asking, ‘Why are you wearing black?’” longtime host Rancic announced to viewers. “There’ll still be all the fun and exciting moments that you have come to expect from the E! red carpet, but we also want to embrace this movement and allow these celebrities who are coming tonight, who have a big voice, to speak on behalf of millions who don’t.”

“We’ve been so excited about changing the carpet and turning something from just a fashion moment in a parade of dresses to something that means so much to all of us ― as women, as mothers, as sisters, as daughters.”

And speak they did, in ways E! may not have predicted. Take, for example, Debra Messing, who used her few minutes on camera to slam the network’s decision to let go of host Catt Sadler last month. Sadler left her gig as an E! News personality after she found out her male co-host and friend, Jason Kennedy, was making double her paycheck.

“We want diversity, we want intersectional gender parity, we want equal pay,” Messing told Rancic at the Globes. “I was so shocked to hear that E! doesn’t believe in paying their female co-hosts the same as their male co-hosts. I miss Catt Sadler and so we stand with her. We want people to start having this conversation that women are just as valuable as men.”

However, notably missing from E!’s coverage were similar proclamations from men. Seacrest and Rancic repeatedly asked women about rising awareness of sexual misconduct in their industry, but failed to ask a single male actor the same types of questions. Instead, the men, #TimesUp pins on their black lapels, were issued the standard carpet queries.

In one eyebrow-raising instance, Seacrest asked “This is Us” star Sterling K. Brown to recount his wife Ryan Michelle Bathe’s birthing story as she stood beside him. The conversation hung on Brown’s role in the labor and delivery process. Eventually, an unamused Bathe looked at both men and said, “Time’s up! Time’s up!”

Sadly, the only man in Seacrest’s company who even briefly mentioned his #TimesUp pin ― or the initiative ― was Armie Hammer, but that was after he spoke about James Franco’s all-male nominees dinner on Saturday night.

When asked via email why the hosts didn’t include men in the discussion about Time’s Up, an E! source referenced Hammer’s remarks and told HuffPost: “Conversation about the movement was woven throughout interviews with celebrities and their activist guests. It was a focus of E!’s entire red carpet today.”

Perhaps E! felt it best to prioritize the voices of women who have been long silenced, who have been made to endure the bland “Who are you wearing?” inquiry for decades.

For over 20 years, the question has been a staple of E!’s awards season coverage, with Joan and Melissa Rivers kicking off their own version of the trend in 1996. “We were the only ones that did [red carpet commentary] in the beginning, and we came up with the phrase, ‘Who are you wearing?,’ and all that stuff,” Joan told E! in 2010. Melissa spoke on the subject with HuffPost last year, explaining that their red carpet show led the now-canceled “Fashion Police” to cement its place in award show culture.

“It’s been a part of my mom’s legacy and my mom’s life, and my legacy,” Melissa Rivers said. “And I’m so grateful that I had the opportunity.”

“Fashion Police” ended in November as it lost steam after the death of Joan Rivers in 2014. By then, her signature sharp, crass humor had already come under fire, particularly when comments like, “That neckline is plunging faster than Aretha Franklin’s head into a bucket of fried chicken,” and “She’s a chubby lady who’s very, very rich, and she should just calm down ― or lose weight,” poured out of her mouth. Despite Rivers’ wide and devoted fan base, many started to ask, “How far is too far?”

Alas, the #TimesUp movement sped up what was already a slow shift away from an awards show entertainment hallmark indelibly shaped by gendered objectification, and, at times, outright bullying.

Michelle Williams put it best, telling NBC: “We’ve been so excited about changing the carpet and turning something from just a fashion moment in a parade of dresses to something that means so much to all of us ― as women, as mothers, as sisters, as daughters.”

Actresses like Williams, Streep and Messing made the difference. There was a lot of pressure on the Globes ahead of time, as critics wondered whether the all-black carpet would be an empty gesture on its own. But what red carpet viewers ended up witnessing, at least in part, was something of a collective promise from women. They were not shy about the $16 million they’ve raised under the Time’s Up banner so far, and how it will be used to make the world a safer place for future generations.

In the era of #TimesUp, did we miss the conventional questions about dresses and jewels? No. Were we more engaged with the conversations between host and talent that took the old questions places? Yes.

But would we have liked to see men speak up on the issue, alongside the women committed to advocacy in a revolutionized Hollywood? Hell yes. We would have loved to have heard Tom Hanks’ response to being grilled as thoroughly as his female counterparts. Or Hugh Jackman speak about something other than his movie “The Greatest Showman.”

Sadly, as the actual awards ceremony unfolded, barely any of the male winners gave speeches that addressed sexual harassment, gender parity or the uncertain future of their industry, either.

There’s no telling how many men ― and women ― are complicit in the entertainment world’s gaping array of problems, and are allowed to hide behind black getups and Time’s Up pins. What we do know is that throughout the past several months, mostly women have been doing the hard work, speaking out against their abusers and supporting one another in an effort to move our culture forward. E! missed its opportunity to call on men to do the same.

If just for a moment, a glitzy side of Hollywood was dimmed, and humanity, inspiration and truth shone through. But let us not forget that black is a form of camouflage. There are more evils to fight. If Hollywood is truly invested in bettering and balancing out every industry, let’s make sure this red carpet shakeup isn’t just a passing thing.

#AskHerMore and #AskHimMore.

Continue Reading

Arts + Culture

Don’t Forget Why Moira Donegan Started The ‘S**tty Media Men’ List In The First Place

Published

on

In October, writer Moira Donegan created a Google doc. This particular document, a spreadsheet made after the first wave of public allegations against Harvey Weinstein hit, allowed women in media and publishing to anonymously record allegations of “shittiness” against men in their industries. The list was live for only a few hours, but in that time more than 70 men were named, alongside descriptions of misconduct that ranged from sending creepy messages to committing multiple violent assaults.

The “Shitty Media Men” list was endlessly dissected over the following weeks. Who started it? Who participated in it? Was it irresponsible? Were the allegations listed even true? Was the list itself indicative of a brewing witch hunt? Was the reaction to the list indicative of a coming backlash? We became so preoccupied with the sheer existence of the list that we downplayed what its mounting cache of claims revealed: that the media industry has a pretty serious sexual harassment problem.

This week, this “Shitty Media Men” debate took a turn when it became widely rumored that Harper’s Magazine was planning to name the creator of the list in a cover story written by controversial author Katie Roiphe. So, despite fears for her own safety and an “I am Spartacus” movement started by other women on the internet to protect her identity, Donegan decided to out herself in a piece for The Cut.

The resulting essay is a beautifully constructed explanation of not only when the spreadsheet was conceived of and how startlingly fast it spread, but also of why Donegan created it in the first place.

“The hope was to create an alternate avenue to report this kind of behavior and warn others without fear of retaliation,” she wrote. “Too often, for someone looking to report an incident or to make habitual behavior stop, all the available options are bad ones.”

It’s this point that is perhaps most salient; something that has been lost in our collective rush to talk about the document and the identity of the young woman behind it, rather than the forces that drove her to create it. The story of the “Shitty Media Men” list has been cast as a narrative about one radical act carried out by one radical young woman. In reality, it’s a story about broken systems and structures ― ones that have failed the most vulnerable among us so frequently that individuals feel they have no choice but to take matters into their own hands.

The structural problems media companies face are diffuse. Employees often aren’t empowered to report incidents of harassment to their managers without fear of retaliation, and managers often aren’t empowered to elevate the issue if it is reported to them. Companies may fail to lay out clear zero-tolerance policies. Human resources departments, if they exist at all, are tasked with protecting employees while simultaneously protecting their company from liability ― tasks that can be at odds. Underlying it all is a deeply rooted history of sexism, built into the very foundation of the industry.

As author Rebecca Traister put it, there’s a “rot at the core of our power structures that makes it harder for women to do work because the whole thing is tipped toward men.”

This rot exists in non-media industries as well. Broadly speaking, when women (and gender nonconforming people and men) experience harassment or assault in a professional setting, the channels for recourse are limited and often unappealing. This helps explain why the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) predicts that 75 percent of workplace harassment incidents are never reported.

Going to your company’s HR department ― or, in some cases, to the police ― often requires a painstaking and detailed reliving of your initial trauma. Your story is guaranteed to be poked and prodded and picked apart in ways that can be deeply painful. In situations that involve potential criminal charges and life-altering consequences, this makes sense ― but it is deeply painful all the same. If you’re a woman, you might also face familiar questions, all meant to hold your narrative up to an imaginary model of perfect victimhood: What were you wearing? How forcefully did you say no? Are you sure he meant it that way? Were you drinking? Did you agree to be alone with him in that office? In that room? In that bar? Did you communicate with him after the incident? Why did you send that email? Why did you send that tweet? Why did you text that emoji?

And after all of this is done, it’s quite possible that the person you say has harassed or assaulted you will face few consequences. You might face some form of retaliation, as 75 percent of people who spoke up about workplace misconduct said they did in a 2003 EEOC study, or you may simply be left to work alongside your alleged harasser until you decide to leave your job.

Look no further than the recent reporting on Vice to find a glaring example in the media industry of how HR can spectacularly fail in its role as employee advocate. “As women, we get harassed everywhere and we don’t feel compelled to report it because it’s not considered a reportable offense,” said one former employee, who was told that she would continue to face sexual harassment in her career “because she was an attractive woman.” “We’re expected to put up with it; it’s the cost of doing business.” It is an irony not lost on those of us in the industry that even as media companies publish reporting on this reckoning, they have often failed to create a safe environment for their own employees.

In the weeks after the “Shitty Media Men” list began circulating, I began speaking to women who worked for companies that had HR departments ― women who reported their alleged harassment through the proper channels and ended up feeling utterly failed by their workplaces. Like the then 27-year-old research assistant whose boss regularly commented on her appearance and said he never would have hired her if he had known she wore glasses so much. She was told by HR that her boss was just “trying to help” her. Or the then 23-year-old basketball coach who told me that her colleagues and supervisor would touch her and openly talk about “what they wanted to do to” her, but was told by HR that it was simply a “he said, she said” situation. Both of these women ended up leaving their jobs and changing career paths. They are far from unique.

Once you’ve lived through one failed attempt at reporting sexual misconduct, you’re unlikely to even try to report similar incidents in the future. It’s this assumption of inaction that creates whisper networks ― those word-of-mouth chains by which women warn each other off shitty men.

Donegan took a “whisper network” and made it concrete, widening its access and laying it bare. Media power brokers ― top editors, influential reporters ― didn’t take notice when women shared stories about the predatory colleagues that they encountered at happy hours and in offices and on Twitter. Their whispers were quiet and invisible, as whispers are. When those whispers were written down, even in a forum that explicitly labeled them as rumors and (by Donegan’s account, intentionally) “had no enforcement mechanisms” by which to levy consequences, the powerful finally took notice. After all, typing is louder than whispering.

The weekend after the “Shitty Media Men” list was published, I sat in a room of women and talked about it. One woman, a writer I admire, compared the list to emergency medical care. If a patient is in danger of bleeding out, a medical team will do whatever it can to stop it. The work is messy and often imperfect, and sometimes there are losses. But it’s necessary.

Perhaps that’s where we are in this reckoning ― doing the imperfect, messy work of trying to stop bleeding that’s been going on for decades.

We needed the “Shitty Media Men” list for a straightforward reason: There are a lot of shitty men in media and few effective ways to avoid them. Let’s deal with that.

Continue Reading

Arts + Culture

Elegant Anniversary Flowers at your Doorstep!

Published

on

The term ‘Anniversary’ is a date during which an event had taken place or establishment of an institution during the previous year. Many countries across the globe observe national anniversaries, which represents the inception of an institution or a government. Birthday anniversary, wedding anniversary and Death anniversary are some of the common types of anniversaries, which are celebrated by people around the world.

Sending or receiving flowers makes you or your loved ones feel something very special. Expressing your love and affection in the form of delivering flowers is much more than sending greeting cards or text messages to your friends and relatives. Celebrating your birthday or wedding anniversary is not complete without the presence of anniversary flowers.  Anniversary Flowers plays a pivotal role during auspicious events owing to its significance and grace.

Nowadays, most of the people prefer attaching personalized text messages while presenting flowers to their loved ones. While some couples opt for traditional anniversary flowers during their wedding anniversary. During the course of this auspicious event, they utilize traditional flowers to adorn their house. Now let us discuss in detail some of the anniversary flowers and its importance.

Anniversary

  • 1st Anniversary: –

During your first anniversary, the Carnations symbolize commitment, happiness, and comfort for the coming years.

 

  • 2nd Anniversary:-

Lily of the Valley is an epitome of love and affection. It is one of the preferred anniversary flowers to celebrate your second anniversary.

 

  • 3rd Anniversary:-

Sun Flowers could be one of your best pics in order to celebrate your third anniversary. It signifies a strong bond between you and your life-partner. Besides that, it symbolizes loyalty and faithfulness.

  • 4th Anniversary:-

Hydrangea is a flower, which symbolizes gratitude and appreciation. It could be a perfect match to celebrate your fourth anniversary.

  • 5th Anniversary:-

Daisies, which is sometimes referred to as ‘Asteraceae’ or ‘Compositae’ represents innocence and sympathy towards your soul mate.

Ordering Anniversary flowers online

Owing to time constraints, most of the people prefer browsing through reliable online florists’ portals where they can choose from a wide variety of anniversary flowers and place their orders online. However, there are plenty of e-commerce portals where the customer can avail the 24/7 customer support. The discerning customers will be offered necessary guidance and support by a team of highly skilled professionals.

One of the major benefits of purchasing anniversary flowers online is that an individual can obtain the flowers at affordable rates rather than spend a huge amount at the nearby local store or retail shop. The customers have the option to select from a wide range of anniversary flowers.

The customers can avail attractive discounts on each purchase, which is offered by the respective e-commerce website, India Flower Mall. Mid-night delivery option is also available where you can surprise your loved ones immediately when the clock struck twelve.

Most of the e-commerce websites ensure that the anniversary flowers are delivered to the customers at attractive rates without burning a hole in their pocket.

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

Trending