Connect with us


How four California universities missed out on $47 million – CalMatters



California, explained
In summary
A state audit says four California universities could have received millions more in federal pandemic money and helped more students. University of California and California State University officials could still recoup some of the cash.
Four California public universities could have received $47 million more in coronavirus aid if they sought funds from a different federal agency, a recent state audit found. As a result, some students may have missed out on support services and equipment during what has been an unprecedented disruption in schooling worldwide. 
California colleges could apply to two pots of money — one supplied by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the other by the U.S. Department of Education, called the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF). Of six University of California and Cal State University campuses audited, four used Department of Education funding for expenses where they should have asked FEMA for reimbursement, the audit said. 
The audit recommended that Chico State, Cal State Long Beach, UC Merced, and UC San Diego apply to FEMA for reimbursement of about $7.5 million in past expenses and $39.7 million in planned expenses so they can use that money to support students.
The other two universities in the audit – Sonoma State and UC Riverside — had used and sought reimbursement appropriately, according to the audit. In total, the six universities received $822 million in HEERF funding. 
FEMA could potentially reimburse campuses for expenses including coronavirus testing, vaccines and temporary medical tents. The U.S. Department of Education provided emergency funding to pay for those expenses, too, but that money could also be used for  other pandemic-related costs such as technology services. 
Though campus officials said FEMA reimbursement is a more difficult process, education advocates said that was not a good enough reason to give up millions.
“Students were having trouble meeting their basic needs,” said Yvonne Muñoz, a higher education policy analyst for the nonprofit advocacy group Education Trust West. “The emergency funding really should have been distributed with an urgency that recognizes that.”
The potential $47 million could have been used to directly support students, Muñoz said. Education Trust and the Global Strategy Group polled 1,010 students about their experiences during the pandemic and found that more students struggled with paying for necessities including rent, food and tuition during the pandemic, and a third of survey respondents frequently skipped meals because they couldn’t afford them. 
“Students were having trouble meeting their basic needs. The emergency funding really should have been distributed with an urgency that recognizes that.”
Keep tabs on the latest California policy and politics news

By clicking subscribe, you agree to share your email address with CalMatters to receive marketing, updates, and other emails from the site owner. Use the unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.

Chico State officials said seeking reimbursement from FEMA isn’t so simple. About three years ago, they asked FEMA for reimbursement for costs associated with the deadly and destructive 2018 Camp Fire, and their claims were fully settled only recently, said Stacie Corona, Chico State’s associate vice president of financial services. Corona said it took almost three years to close out their FEMA claim for the Camp Fire.
“It’s quite a process, it’s a lot of back and forth,” Corona said. 
Still, they’ve asked FEMA to reimburse $367,409 for pandemic-related expenses, and the campus hasn’t yet been paid, she said. The costs covered by the claims include PPE, cleaning supplies and sanitation stations, Corona said. The university has also filed a claim with FEMA for the additional $164,000 that the audit said it should reallocate from their HEERF spending, she said.
An official at UC San Diego — which lost out on the most with $4.3 million in spent dollars and $36.3 million in planned spending that FEMA could reimburse — also “indicated that FEMA’s claims process puts a large administrative burden on campuses to gather all of the required documents, such as invoices and receipts associated with each expense,” according to the audit.
“We agree with the recommendations outlined in the audit and are working on the recommended improvements to strengthen our use of federal aid funds, maximize the benefit of those funds to the University community, and ensure compliance with the changing landscape of federal rules and requirements governing the distribution of this aid,“ a spokesperson for UC San Diego said in a statement.
During a normal year, FEMA typically took about three to six months to process and approve applications for funds. During the pandemic, though, it could take about six to 12 months, according to the audit. Though campuses would have to wait for the money, the audit urged officials to apply anyway. 
“Regardless of the amount of time it takes FEMA to process these claims, the millions of dollars the campuses could receive should outweigh their reluctance to engage in this process,” the audit said.
The audit explained where four schools went wrong with their federal aid, and where two schools — Sonoma State and UC Riverside — made better decisions. 
Cal State Long Beach spent $2.836 million from the Department of Education on expenses including a temporary medical tent, coronavirus testing and vaccines, when it could have asked FEMA to reimburse those costs, the audit said. UC Merced spent $113,000 on FEMA-refundable items as well.
By comparison, the audit noted Sonoma State and UC Riverside made sure to use Department of Education funding for items that couldn’t be reimbursed by FEMA — such as purchasing technology for students. 
“Regardless of the amount of time it takes FEMA to process these claims, the millions of dollars the campuses could receive should outweigh their reluctance to engage in this process.”
The audit found the UC Office of the President and the Cal State Chancellor’s Office should have given more guidance to schools on how to disperse the federal funding to avoid any mistakes.
Universities distributed the grant money to their students differently. So students at some colleges received grants while students at other colleges didn’t, even if they were in similar financial situations.
For example, UC San Diego gave out the same amount of automatic grants to nearly all students, while UC Riverside distributed grants based on students’ expected family contribution in their financial aid documents. 
These grants also varied by school. For example: a student who had an expected family contribution of $1 to $2,000 would receive a grant of $900 at Chico State, $1,300 at Sonoma State and $500 at CSU Long Beach.
Students at Cal State Long Beach, Chico State and Sonoma State could also apply for additional grants  if they believed their college underestimated their pandemic-related expenses. Cal State Long Beach, however, only awarded extra grants to students if they applied for money because of the change to virtual instruction. 
The CalMatters College Journalism Network spoke with students across the state about going back to campus — the highs, the lows, the weird.
Nathen Ortiz, a student intern at Let’s Go To College CA and a senior at Cal State Fullerton, said he received a grant from his university that was deposited into his bank account. He said he would have liked to see more engagement with students, to provide students more information about the grants, including where the funding came from and how students could apply for more aid. 
“Every university should be including a lot more students in terms of budgeting and how certain money should be allocated across different campus departments,” Ortiz said. 
The fact that grants were dispersed differently across universities shows how “higher education is very inequitable,” he added. 
The differences in grant funding caused confusion among students. When students compared how much federal aid they received with friends at their own university and other universities, they didn’t know why other people qualified for more funding and others for less, according to Marcos Montes, the program manager of Let’s Go to College CA, a program created to support students through the coronavirus pandemic. 
“It’s important for campuses to find the balance between ensuring that they are catering to the needs of their specific student populations, but also that there is uniformity in how they spend and use those dollars,” Montes said. 
As the audit recommended, the UCOP will require each campus to write a report on their pandemic-related expenses from January 2020 to Dec. 31, 2021 to ensure all eligible items are submitted to FEMA for reimbursement, according to university spokesperson Joanna McWilliams. The university hasn’t set a deadline yet for the reports, she said. 
The Cal State Chancellor’s Office, however, will not require campuses to submit a report but will assist campuses who want to apply to FEMA for reimbursement, spokesperson Mike Uhlenkamp said. 
“In addition to adding an additional level of bureaucracy to the process, there is also no guarantee that FEMA will approve those claims, much less in a timely manner,” Uhlenkamp said via email. He added that the average wait time for reimbursement claims from FEMA to campuses is 279 days.
Mendoza, Zappelli and Ananthavel are fellows with the CalMatters College Journalism Network, a collaboration between CalMatters and student journalists from across California. This story and other higher education coverage are supported by the College Futures Foundation.

Resident advisers on college campuses have a complicated job in a normal year, and the COVID-19 pandemic is adding to their workload this fall.
Cal State University requires all staff and students going on campus to get vaccinated. But enforcement has varied across the system.
We want to hear from you
Want to submit a guest commentary or reaction to an article we wrote? You can find our submission guidelines here. Please contact CalMatters with any commentary questions:



Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


Realm Scans: Navigating the Uncharted Territories of Digital Discovery



In the expansive landscape of digital exploration, there exists a realm where information becomes an adventure—Realm Scans. Beyond a mere scanning service, this digital haven is where curiosity converges with innovation, and the uncharted territories of digital discovery come to life. Join us as we embark on a journey to unravel the unique dynamics of Realm Scans, navigating through the realms where information is not just scanned but transformed into a digital odyssey.

“Digital Horizons: Exploring the Essence of Realm Scans” is not just a title; it’s an exploration into the multifaceted dimensions of a scanning service that transcends the mundane. This article is an invitation to delve into the layers of technological prowess, user-centric design, and the transformative impact that defines Realm Scans in the dynamic world of digital information.

At the core of Realm Scans lies a commitment to redefining how we interact with information. “Digital Horizons” delves into the innovative features and functionalities that make Realm Scans more than just a scanning service. It’s a digital gateway where documents become gateways to exploration, and information is a portal to new discoveries.

A standout feature is the user-centric approach that defines the Realm Scans experience. “Digital Horizons” explores how user interface design, accessibility, and intuitive navigation are seamlessly integrated to create an environment where users don’t just scan documents—they embark on a digital journey of discovery.

Realm Scans is not confined by the traditional boundaries of scanning; it is a catalyst for a digital revolution. “Digital Horizons” illustrates how Realm Scans empowers users to go beyond the expected, transforming the act of scanning into a dynamic and enriching experience that transcends conventional notions.

As we navigate through the digital horizons of Realm Scans, the article becomes a celebration of the fusion between technology and user experience. It is a recognition that in the world of digital services, there are realms where functionality meets innovation, and where information is a gateway to new digital frontiers.

“Digital Horizons: Exploring the Essence of Realm Scans” is not just an article; it’s an ode to the tech enthusiasts, the information seekers, and the digital explorers who recognize the profound impact of a scanning service that goes beyond the surface. It’s an acknowledgment that in the realms of digital discovery, Realm Scans stands as a beacon, inviting users to embrace the transformative power of information in the digital age.

As Realm Scans continues to redefine the digital scanning landscape, “Digital Horizons” invites us to appreciate the nuances of a service that transforms the ordinary into the extraordinary—an exploration where every scan is not just a document but a digital adventure waiting to be unfolded.

Harry Clam

Continue Reading