WASHINGTON (AP) The moment Kurt Groszhans set out from North Dakota for Ukraine in 2017, he was keen to reconnect to his ancestral home and cultivate the fertile black soil that the country is famous for.
However, his partnership with the law professor, who’s now a senior Ukrainian government official, quickly dissolved amid a scuffle and accusations and culminated in his arrest in November last year on the charge of plotting to kill his former business associate. His family and friends say they are not accurate and fabricated to discredit Groszhan’s accusations that he was a corrupt official in Ukraine, a country caught in a tug of war between Russian and Western interests and attempting to erase its image of corruption and corruption.
The situation is unfolding as Ukraine is preparing for a possible Russian invasion. It is reported that the U.S. has ordered the families of American staff in the U.S. Embassy there to move out. The tumult has the Groszhan family worried the North Dakota farmer could be abandoned and authorities of the U.S. government preoccupied with more general concerns about potential military action and geopolitical turmoil.
“We’re concerned for my brother’s safety in the present, especially about what you’re hearing about in the news regarding the Russian soldiers at our border,” the sister of his, Kristi Magnusson, told an interview for The Associated Press. As she feared that an attack could trigger an evacuation for U.S. diplomatic staff, she urged the Biden administration and the State Department to “use their leverage” to bring him home.
“If the embassy’s not in the area to assess the man and ensure that the man is in good health, we don’t know what will take place,” she added.
When asked for their comments When asked for comment, The State Department said the administration was committed to aiding those in detention Americans and was monitoring the situation; however, it declined to discuss the matter further.
Republican Senate. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, who has recently visited Groszhans in the detention center where he’s awaiting trial, claimed that the incident has “created friction between myself and the Ukrainians, even if it’s not our two governments. This must be resolved” in a moment when U.S. and Ukrainian interests must be in alignment in tackling the threat posed by Moscow.
“This little bit of friction isn’t necessary,” he added. “And I believe we can free ourselves from it by releasing Kurt.”
Grosshans, a farmer of 50 years old of Ashley, North Dakota, visited in 2017 Ukraine, which is the country where his ancestors came from. According to his sister, the opportunity to work on the world’s most sought-after black soil was a “dream fulfilled,” and he invested in a substantial amount to get his farm in operation. In a nation with a highly prized agricultural industry, Groszhans was proud of his accomplishments. She added sending photos to his family members of his harvests.
There, he established a connection with law professor Roman Leshchenko, who offered himself as a native speaker who had experience in the local agriculture industry and the regulations. Groshans appointed him director of his firm.
Things went downhill rapidly.
Grosshans has claimed in a suit and an online blog post that Leshchenko started embezzling funds from him, defrauding Groszhans of more than $250,000 total, and transferring funds to a family business. Grosshans has been outspoken about his claims and has described himself in a Medium article in August as a “humble” but an ill-informed investor.
“Probably I’m not the first or last American investor who has made an error in the person hired to be a manager. But the nature of the manager makes my experience distinctive,” he wrote.
Leshchenko did not respond to the AP. However, she has denied allegations of embezzlement in interviews with Ukrainian media. He also insists that the men had an agreement that the company owned by Leshchenko would oversee the farming operation.
He’s made his accusations against Groszhans and claimed that an American farmer had planted genetically modified soybeans prohibited from cultivation and sale within Ukraine. This discovery prompted Leshchenko to quit his position at the company and was the reason for their disagreement.
Ukrainian media that started to investigate the crisis revealed that Leshchenko had used a portion of the funds to make an approximately $60,000 donation to the campaign of the current Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Later, he announced Leshchenko as the minister in charge of food and agricultural policy.
The AP could not independently confirm the source. Zelenskyy’s Office did not respond to a request to comment.
Amid controversy over the donation, Leshchenko was interviewed by the Kyiv Post last year. The article claimed that the $60,000 contribution came from the dying father of Leshchenko. Leshchenko stated that he and his father believed Zelenskyy “as one and only one who would like to transform Ukraine and bring about structural changes.”
Magnusson claims Leshchenko, in the end, did repay some of her money for her son and threatened to bring him to justice If he didn’t cease talking in public about his fraud allegations.
On November 1, Groszhans was arrested, along with an assistant for allegedly conspiring to assassinate Leshchenko and other people. These are allegations Groszhans supporters believe are fabricated but could result from Groszhan’s appointment of a private investigator to look into Leshchenko in connection with his lawsuit.
As his family and his supporters consider, the detention was a justification to silence his complaints, especially in a country that has tried to shore the military and diplomatic assistance by U.S. U.S. through reassurances. It is taking serious steps to stop corruption.
“My brother has never had a chance to get into legal trouble in the entire fifty years of life,” Magnusson said. “And we’re not convinced that all of this is accurate because you wouldn’t want to kill someone in the hopes of obtaining the money legally due towards you?”
The group’s supporters are asking the Biden administration to officially declare the detainee as a wrongful one, which could permit this case to be transferred into the Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs in the State Department.
However, his family is concerned that the chance of being heard about Groszhan’s situation could be limited due to the potential for an invasion from Russia and the diminishing diplomatic presence of the U.S.
“It is making us more worried for Kurt and his safety knowing that people are departing and Kurt is not being remembered and abandoned,” Magnusson said.
After Twitter: The Impact of Trump’s Removal from Social Media on Politics, Society, and Technology.
In January, former US President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms following his alleged involvement in inciting the Capitol Hill riots. This move by social media giants ignited a heated debate on the regulation of free speech, the power of big tech, and the influence of social media on politics and society. In this article, we will examine the impact of Trump’s removal from social media on politics, society, and technology and how it may shape the future of these domains.
The ban of Donald Trump from social media was a significant event in the political sphere. Trump had over 80 million followers on Twitter and had been known for his Twitter tirades, which often sparked controversy and debate. Many of his tweets were seen as divisive, offensive, and dangerous. The social media ban, therefore, removed a major platform that he had used to communicate with his supporters and the general public.
The removal of Trump from social media sparked a fierce debate on the role of social media in political discourse. Some argued that the ban was an infringement on Trump’s right to free speech and that social media companies had too much power to silence voices that they disagreed with. Others pointed out that social media companies were within their rights to regulate content on their platforms, especially if it incited violence or hate speech.
The ban of Donald Trump from social media has also highlighted the need for greater regulation of social media platforms. Many have called for stricter laws to hold social media companies accountable for the content on their platforms. The debate on the regulation of social media companies is ongoing, and it is likely to have far-reaching consequences for politics, society, and technology.
The impact of Trump’s removal from social media on society has been significant. Trump’s tweets were often divisive and offensive, and his ban from social media has created a more peaceful online environment. However, it has also resulted in the polarization of the public discourse. Trump’s supporters, in particular, have been angered by the social media ban, and some have migrated to alternative social media platforms.
The ban of Donald Trump from social media has also sparked a broader debate on the influence of social media on society. Social media has been linked to a range of social problems, including cyberbullying, fake news, and political polarization. The debate on the impact of social media on society is ongoing, and it is likely to continue to be a significant issue for years to come.
The removal of Trump from social media has highlighted the power of big tech companies. Social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have become an essential part of modern life, with billions of users worldwide. The social media ban of Trump has shown that these companies have the power to regulate content on their platforms and to influence public opinion.
The ban of Donald Trump from social media has also highlighted the importance of developing alternative social media platforms that are more open and decentralized. Alternative platforms like Parler and Gab have seen a surge in popularity since the social media ban of Trump, as they offer a more conservative and libertarian-friendly space for social media users.
The debate on the regulation of social media companies is also likely to drive innovation in the technology industry. As governments and regulatory bodies call for greater accountability and transparency from social media companies, there will be a need for new technologies to help regulate content and ensure that it meets certain standards.
The removal of Donald Trump from social media has sparked a heated debate on the regulation of free speech, the power of big tech, and the influence of social media on politics and society. The ban of Trump from social media has had a significant impact on politics, society, and technology.