Connect with us

Opinion

Being A Jerk Can Permanently Affect A Lawyer’s Reputation.

Published

on

The legal profession is a tiny community, and being an obnoxious person can have sweeping consequences.

While there may be an abundance of lawyers in your area, the legal profession is typically less populated than most people think. In reality, lawyers are likely to have a relationship with each other or connect with an attorney. A person’s reputation may be with them for quite a while in the legal field. Lawyers who behave like idiots could be seen as unfavorable by other lawyers. This could affect their reputation for a long time in various ways.

Lawyers rely on their reputations for various reasons throughout their careers. Lawyers typically change jobs several times and may depend on their reputation and the opinions of others about them to progress in the hiring process. Lawyers also use their prestige to obtain referrals from other attorneys. Lawyers generally do not refer matters to legal professionals they trust, as the referral could be reflected on the attorney who directed it. Lawyers may also be required to have another lawyer sign on their behalf if they’re seeking admission to a bar or any other professional credential in the legal field.

Therefore, it’s essential not to be unprofessional so that your name is not tarnished within the legal profession. In my experience, I’ve seen numerous times in my career that lawyers’ reputations impacted their ability to carry out their job in the future.

For example, I was employed by a law company involved in a significant case that also involved several different law companies. I didn’t handle this task on my own however I knew the attorneys who dealt with the issue and other aspects. When I was in court, waiting for a court hearing to start, I began chatting with another attorney about my case. He instantly discussed how I worked on this significant issue that my former firm had been working on. When I explained the location, I worked in the past.

The lawyer in question asked me whether I had was a partner from my previous firm. I said that I did. The lawyer began to tell me that the partner was the wrong person and had irritated a number of lawyers involved in the case. My former boss said to several defendants that he would like to share expertise that, as lawyers realize, is a significant benefit when litigating. Sharing experts means that lawyers can share the burden of litigation between themselves and that their clients don’t need to take the financial cost of securing experts in isolation. My former boss later decided to pull from the agreement to share experts. My lawyer informed me that this threw a wrench for him and other lawyers.

I thought that this was an isolated exchange. However, after my profession, I had a conversation with a lawyer involved in that enormous issue that my old firm had been working on. The lawyer also asked me whether I was a senior partner from my previous firm. I replied that I did and that another lawyer began talking about how my boss pulled out of the agreement to share expert knowledge and caused several lawyer and clients in the bag. I couldn’t believe that lawyers talked about something that my ex-boss had done years ago, and his reputation took an enormous hit. The public remembered the incident several years later.

In my time, I have also met employees who were not well-known due to their work or the way they conducted themselves in the office. I had a chance to work with an associate who most associates disregarded. The company where we worked was in a highly political atmosphere, and the partners gave associates projects. This meant that associates were sometimes required to use unconventional strategies to obtain work to meet the billable hours need.

One of the associates was known as a liar to partners who claimed they were busier than they actually were so that the attorney could obtain assignments that were not available to other lawyers. Additionally, there was a belief that the attorney could get out of some of the non-billable business development initiatives that associates were required to do periodically in the firm. I have heard that the associate’s name was a factor in the new firm that this associate was working for, most likely because the legal profession is small. The people working in the new firm had connections to attorneys from the law firm we employed.

When I started law school in the year I was a student, the President of the Student Bar Association told the new students to approach law school as high school. The news is fast-moving, and everyone was not looking to build a bad name in law school, which could be carried all over the world for the duration of their lives. In a way, the legal profession is a very small group, and being someone who is a nuisance can have wide-ranging consequences. Therefore, lawyers must remember that they must not let their goals of the moment or other reasons allow lawyers to damage their reputations. This could harm their careers for many years to come.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Former Tesla Employees Sue The Company Over An Alleged Abusive Behaviour Reminiscent.

Published

on

Kaylen Barker, a Black woman who worked in the Tesla manufacturing facility, filed a lawsuit last week in California asserting that the automaker allows “rampant acts of racism” within its manufacturing facilities.

The lawsuit of Barker details a string of racist incidents that escalated in 2023, which the automaker was said to have been unaware of until a colleague hit her with a “hot tool”, at her and slammed her with a racial insult and used insulting words. The confrontation resulted in Barker with a swollen thigh, and she is still suffering “emotional distress, humiliation, shame and embarrassment,” according to the suit.

The offender was fired and rehired 2 weeks later, per the lawsuit. The lawsuit states that Barker was employed at the Tesla factory in Lathrop, California.

“Being a Black worker at a Tesla’s renowned California factory is to be forced to step back in time and suffer painful abuses reminiscent of the Jim Crow era,” the lawsuit claims.

The lawsuit that Barker filed in the Superior Court of California claims that she was subjected to harassment following her appointment to supervise coworkers working in the brakes department of Tesla vehicles.

The suit claims an employee claimed that the “Black girl” should not be promoted over her and Barker “is Black and doesn’t know anything.”

Barker, 25, who is 25, said she would inform Tesla’s Human Resources department “and” her supervisor after each incident of racism; however, Barker wasn’t informed of any corrective measures taking place until the incident involving that hot instrument, as stated in the lawsuit.

Tesla has not responded to a request for comments.

The automaker has faced allegations of racism issues in its work environment before.

Owen Diaz, a former Tesla employee, received $136.9 million in compensation last year when the jury found that the company discriminated against racial minorities in the workplace. Others Tesla employees have been suing in recent times, accusing the company of having a toxic environment within its manufacturing facility.

Tesla was unconvinced of the verdict in the case of Diaz.

“While we strongly believe that these facts don’t justify the verdict reached by the jury in San Francisco, we do recognize that in 2015 and 2016 we were not perfect,” Valerie Capers Workman, Tesla’s vice president at the time of employees, wrote in an article on the Tesla blog. “We’re still far from being perfect. However, we’ve come quite many steps from 5 months ago.”

Workman left Tesla in late March, per her LinkedIn profile, and released Tesla’s first equity, diversity and inclusion report in 2023.

Black as well as African American employees are 10 per cent of Tesla’s US workforce, as per the 2020 report. Additionally, women make up 21% of the US workforce. Women comprise 17% of the top leadership positions in Tesla’s US workforce.

Tesla isn’t the only automaker to have employees who have been able to report experiencing racism in the production plant.

A lawsuit filed in 2018 by General Motors described nooses being hanging and “whites-only” written on a bathroom. GM has stated in the past that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable and to treat any reported incident with compassion and urgency. Ford has also been sued, claiming it discriminates against people of colour. Ford has stated that it is against discrimination and takes allegations seriously.

Continue Reading

Trending

%d bloggers like this: